This week on the Pro-Life America podcast, we take a look at what a Post-Roe America could look like and the major division over Incrementalist vs Purist legislation that has caused infighting within the Pro-Life Movement – as well as pro-life legislation to fail. It’s time we settled this once and for all!
This week, we discuss the latest news stories revealing the left’s love of verbal gymnastics – including the White House’s new budget replacing the word mothers with “birthing people,” and a British pro-choicer’s new term for men found in their op-ed titled, “A letter to the Anti-Abortion Protestors.” Plus, we discuss the graduation speech that has literally everyone talking.
In a decision both sides are calling a turning point, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization – the lawsuit over Mississippi’s new law banning abortions after 15 weeks, is headed to the Supreme Court. We discuss all the potential outcomes and our theories as to why, after years of skillfully dodging most abortion cases, we think the Supreme Court is hearing this one now – and the answer may surprise you.
As a wave of pro-life bills are being proposed by states around the country, the debate over incremental legislation is reignited. The hosts discuss the important distinction between advocating vs supporting a bill with exceptions, the effects of passing bills with exceptions, and potential danger zones.