#78 – Are Politicians Elected To Impose Beliefs?
Some politicians claim to be pro-life, but say they would not impose their personal beliefs on others. Watch to see why this claim is an utter sham.
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
Like how some politicians claim to be pro-life, but say they would not impose their personal beliefs on others. Watch to see why this claim is an utter sham.
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
Some politicians claim to be pro-life, but say they would not impose their personal beliefs on others. But imposing their beliefs is what politicians are elected to do, and it’s what every law they pass does. Besides, if they’re not going to impose their own views, whose views are they going to impose? Let’s also remember that unborn babies are slaughtered by the millions because the personal beliefs of pro-choice politicians are imposed on them.
Look, the only reason for someone to be opposed to abortion is because they agree that the unborn are living human beings. So the question is: are there any other innocent human beings that these people think it should be legal to kill? Or is that a standard they reserve only for those human beings who can’t fight back, have no money, and can’t vote?
***END***
Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#74 -Bragging About Eugenics?!
Some countries are now bragging that they have virtually eliminated Down Syndrome from their population. The obvious assumption is that they have discovered a cure. But that’s not the case…
#60 – How The Pro-choice Side uses Foster care To Divert Attention From Adoption
When adoption is suggested as an alternative to abortion, the pro-choice side likes to divert attention by talking about the children already in foster care and not getting adopted.
#86 – “Governments Often Pay For Things Taxpayers Disagree With.”
When the abortion lobby demands government funding for abortion, they often argue that it is common for governments to pay for things that some taxpayers disagree with. But at the same time these same people say that the government has no right to be involved in the abortion issue.