#78 – Are Politicians Elected To Impose Beliefs?
Some politicians claim to be pro-life, but say they would not impose their personal beliefs on others. Watch to see why this claim is an utter sham.
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
Like how some politicians claim to be pro-life, but say they would not impose their personal beliefs on others. Watch to see why this claim is an utter sham.
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
Some politicians claim to be pro-life, but say they would not impose their personal beliefs on others. But imposing their beliefs is what politicians are elected to do, and it’s what every law they pass does. Besides, if they’re not going to impose their own views, whose views are they going to impose? Let’s also remember that unborn babies are slaughtered by the millions because the personal beliefs of pro-choice politicians are imposed on them.
Look, the only reason for someone to be opposed to abortion is because they agree that the unborn are living human beings. So the question is: are there any other innocent human beings that these people think it should be legal to kill? Or is that a standard they reserve only for those human beings who can’t fight back, have no money, and can’t vote?
***END***
Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#38 – “Abortion Bans Are Forced Motherhood!”
The pro-choice side likes to argue that prohibitions against abortion are just “forced motherhood.” Watch to see why this argument is a lie…
#28 – “A Fetus Doesn’t Have Any Right To Life Until It’s Viable!”
Some abortion defenders say that a fetus doesn’t have a right to life until it is viable and can live on its own outside the womb. But the real issue is that viability has absolutely nothing to do with the question of whether the unborn are living human beings or not.
#18 – “Abortions often allow women to have successful careers!”
The pro-choice side argues that abortions often allow women to have successful careers that they could not have had if they were saddled with a baby. And if their point is that it’s possible to profit from killing other people, they’re right. In fact, it happens all the time. But is that really a justification for the intentional killing of another human being?