#42 – Are You Pro-Choice With Exceptions?
Some people claim to be “pro-life” while at the same time saying that abortion should be allowed in some situations. In other words, they are “pro-choice with exceptions.” See why…
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
But some times it is also necessary to expose the illogical arguments of those who claim to be “pro-life.” For example, some people claim to be “pro-life” while at the same time saying that abortion should be allowed in some situations. In other words, they are “pro-choice with exceptions.” See why…
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
When people claim to be pro-life, while at the same time saying that abortion should be allowed in some situations, what they are actually saying is that they support the “choice” to kill certain babies but oppose the “choice” to kill others. In other words, they are “pro-choice with exceptions.”
Remember, the only basis for the pro-life position is that a new human life is created at the moment of fertilization. So when someone says that they are pro-life but that some abortions should be allowed, their position is that the unborn are living human beings, but it’s okay to kill some of them. By definition, that means they are not pro-life. For the person who is legitimately pro-life, there is never an excuse that justifies intentionally taking the life of any unborn child.
***END***

Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#59 – The Flaw With The Pro-Choice “Trust Women” Argument
The pro-choice side claims that when it comes to abortion, they trust women to make their own decisions. But why do they only apply it to abortion?
#48 – What If Pro-Lifers Are Wrong?
Pro-choicers will ask pro-lifers if we have ever thought about the possibility that we are wrong. So let’s dive into the potential consequences of each side being wrong.
#114 – Is Birth Control The Way To Prevent Abortions?
Birth control is often pushed as the way to prevent abortions. But does this argument actually hold up in real life? Let’s look at the evidence…