This week on the podcast, we discuss the outrageous pro-choice concepts that we often treat with a seriousness that they don’t deserve – such as “consent to pregnancy,” “reproductive justice,” how the term fetus is used to indicate the unborn aren’t human babies, and more! Plus, we talk about the growing number of pro-lifers convicted of violating the F.A.C.E. act, and the legal debate it has sparked about its constitutionality and how it can be weaponized.
Pro-choicers will ask pro-lifers if we have ever thought about the possibility that we are wrong. So let’s dive into the potential consequences of each side being wrong.
One of the pro-choice mob’s standard rationalizations for abortion is that every child should be a wanted child. In other words, as long as we label a child “unwanted,” it should be legal to kill them.
You’ll often hear the pro-choice mob argue that “consent to sex is not consent to be pregnant.” Watch to see why this is an absolutely stupid defense for abortion.
This week on the podcast, we discuss two things all pro-lifers should be keeping their eyes out for: the sex education programs making their way into schools around the nation, and the abortion views of their significant other. As we reveal, these two things are having a profound impact on countless people across the country.
The pro-choice mob often screams things like, “no uterus – no opinion.” Don’t be fooled into thinking that their contempt for the opinions of men means that they have respect for the opinions of women. They don’t. The motivation behind this argument isn’t what you think…
Some people question how the pro-life movement can object to parts harvested from aborted babies being used in fetal tissue research and embryonic stem cell research. They argue that these babies are already dead and something good can come from it. But let’s take an honest look at that argument…
The pro-choice side says that the law has no right to control what a woman does with her own body. But let’s follow the science…
The pro-choice side often defends abortion with the argument that women have a right to control their own bodies. Of course, this assumes that the unborn child is part of the mother’s body and ignores the biological reality that they are separate individuals.
The pro-choice claims claims that any government that can tell a woman she can’t have an abortion, can also tell her she has to have one. The fact is, the only women who have ever been forced by their governments to have abortions, live in countries where abortion is legal – not illegal.
No products in the cart.
