#46 – “Consent To Sex Isn’t Consent To Pregnancy!!”
You’ll often hear the pro-choice mob argue that “consent to sex is not consent to be pregnant.” Watch to see why this is an absolutely stupid defense for abortion.
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
Like how you’ll often hear the pro-choice mob argue that “consent to sex is not consent to be pregnant.” Watch to see why this is an absolutely stupid defense for abortion.
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
In their attempt to justify abortion, you’ll often hear the pro-choice mob argue that “consent to sex is not consent to be pregnant.” It’s about as stupid a statement as saying that living on potato chips, Twinkies, and Dr. Pepper is not consent to be fat.
The fact is, the possibility of pregnancy is a natural and predictable consequence of sexual activity, and unless a woman is a complete idiot, she knows this when she jumps into bed with someone. So the pro-choice mob can sugarcoat it all they want to, but having an abortion is just another way of saying, “I will pay the psychopaths who work at the abortion clinic to butcher my child so I don’t have to accept responsibility for my actions.” And that makes it the ultimate combination of immaturity, selfishness and immorality.
***END***
Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#68 – Where Are The Calls For Legislation To Make Force or Abortion Coercion a Federal Crime?
It’s well known that women and girls are often forced to have abortions against their will. And yet, the “my body, my choice” crowd is fully aware of this problem but silently looks the other way. Watch to see why…
#38 – “Abortion Bans Are Forced Motherhood!”
The pro-choice side likes to argue that prohibitions against abortion are just “forced motherhood.” Watch to see why this argument is a lie…
#86 – “Governments Often Pay For Things Taxpayers Disagree With.”
When the abortion lobby demands government funding for abortion, they often argue that it is common for governments to pay for things that some taxpayers disagree with. But at the same time these same people say that the government has no right to be involved in the abortion issue.