#129 – “I’m Pro-Choice But I’m Uncomfortable With Late-Term Abortions.”
Some members of the pro-choice side will claim that they are personally troubled by late term abortions. But don’t be fooled.
Some members of the pro-choice side will claim that they are personally troubled by late term abortions. But don’t be fooled.
The pro-choice side argues that abortion should be legal because women have the right to control their own bodies. But remember this…
It’s time for pro-lifers to stop being so easily manipulated. Our job is not to sit around the campfire and sing Kumbayah with people who torture and slaughter helpless children for money.
If a man has no say in whether or not this child is killed, how can he be held responsible for the welfare of that child?
Sometimes the pro-choice side will equate elective abortion to amputation. But are these two things morally equivalent? Let’s take a look…
The pro-choice side argues that women are going to have abortions no matter what the law says, and keeping them legal makes sure they happen in a safe environment. Of course, this is a preposterous argument. See why…
One of the abortion lobby’s marketing strategies is to portray women as victims of their pregnancies where the children are their enemies. Of course, the goal behind all this is obvious…
Some abortion defenders say that abortion is not murder because the fetus is not fully developed. But that doesn’t make it okay to kill them.
The pro-choice side has accused the pro-life movement of being a bunch of “anti-choice extremists who are trying to force their religious beliefs on everyone else.” Since “choice” means having the legal right to butcher defenseless children, then we are indeed anti-choice. But as for the claim that we are trying pass laws to force our theological views on others, that is idiocy.
How many times do we hear that “the pro-life movement should spend its resources helping people who are already here.” But of course, the unborn are already here. If that’s not true, then where are they?