Episode 85 | Surrogacy & IVF – Good or Bad?

To kick off the new year, we go back to basics and define what pro-life means and how it is different from simply being opposed to abortion. We also talk about why pro-lifers must be pro-life without exceptions, when does someone become a human being, sex selection abortions and more! This is an important episode for all pro-lifers!

Episode Synopsis:

Wonder why we disappeared suddenly for two weeks? Thank Coronavirus. In our first show back from COVID, we discuss the controversies over surrogacy and In Vitro Fertilization and why the pro-life movement needs to be discussing them. After listening to the episode, we invite listeners to share their opinion below!

Episode Duration: 22 min

Web player not showing? Click here.
In This Episode We Discuss:
  1. Greetings (00:24)
  2. We survived COVID (00:42)
  3. Surrogacy and the current controversy (1:32)
  4. IVF (7:39)
  5. Children as a commodity? (17:09)
  6. Tripwire’s in debating abortion & getting back to our pro-life roots (19:06)
  7. Closing Statements (20:34)
Links:

Like This Episode?

Why Not Check Out Some of our Other Episodes?

Like this one..

Have an idea for a show? Let us know here.


Then Subscribe The Pro-Life America Podcast On Your Favorite Podcast Platform So You Don’t Miss An Episode

Right now, our show is available on 25 different platforms/ apps. We know that’s a bunch, but our goal is to make it as easy to access as possible. Click the subscribe button below to pull up the full list of where you can listen and subscribe.


And Why Not Leave A Review Of The Show?

Ratings and reviews are so important! Your review helps us learn what you like and dislike about the show so we can make it the best it can be. Your review also encourages others to listen which helps get this information to more people. So please, take the time and leave a review today.


Don’t Forget To Share This Episode
With Your Pro-Life Friends!

Sharing our podcast on social media is so easy. Simply click the share link on the audio player above to easily copy the link or share the episode directly on Facebook, Twitter, or LinkedIn.


0 Comments

  1. Dave Melechinsky says:

    On surrogacy, IVF, and “getting back to our roots”: Yes, abortion is merely a mechanism for separating the unborn child from its life. But it’s more than that. Abortion exists primarily to divorce the reproductive act from its normal effect, which is reproduction. Its purpose is to promote pleasure without responsibility, to divorce cause from effect. It is intrinsically perverse for that reason alone. There are other perversities as well, including IVF, surrogacy, contraception, sodomy, and transgenderism, to name a few. All of these are revolts against God’s natural order, as all of them deliberately separate the reproductive act from reproduction.
    God has ordained BOTH that the act that brings new human life into the world should be enjoyable, AND that the act should bring new life and responsibility. For mankind to engineer sex without birth OR birth without sex is to shake his fist in the Face of God, and say “I know better than You!”. Our society is now reaping the penalty for that revolt– Having sought “freedom” from God’s Laws, we are becoming slaves, ruled by our enemies. Only mass repentance through prayer and penance can restore our freedom.

  2. I recommend looking at thembeforeus.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Episodes:

Episode 111 | China’s Population Crisis

Episode 111 | China’s Population Crisis

With all the recent news and revelations about China, we decided to discuss China’s population crisis and its push for dominance despite the data showing that their population bust is happening much faster than anyone anticipated. We reveal what this means for China’s economic state and how it has impacted their laws limiting the number of children families are allowed to have. Plus, we discuss the shocking loss in Kansas and a New York Times article that claims that, “the line between abortion and pregnancy loss has always been blurry.”