#58 – “The fetus depends on the woman for survival. So it’s her body, her choice.”
The pro-choice mob often defends abortions before viability on the basis that the unborn are dependent on someone else to survive. But if an unborn baby has no right to life simply because he or she is unable to survive without help, then there are others who have no right to life either.
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
Like how the pro-choice side often defends abortions before viability on the basis that the unborn are dependent on someone else to survive. See why this argument is flawed…
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
The pro-choice mob often defends abortions before viability on the basis that the unborn are dependent on someone else to survive. But by that standard, a six-month old baby is no more viable than an unborn baby since neither can survive without the support of others. This could also be said about some severely handicapped people, or those who are senile, comatose, unconscious, or under general anesthesia. If an unborn baby has no right to life simply because he or she is unable to survive without help, then these people have no right to life either.
Of course, another reason viability cannot be used to justify abortion is that the abortionist is the one who gets to determine whether his victim is viable or not. And if there is a better example of the fox guarding the hen-house, I don’t know what it would be.
***END***
Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#55 – From “Pro-Choice” To “No-Choice.”
The pro-choice mob says that abortion is a private matter and the government has no right to be involved. But also demands that the government use taxpayer money to buy abortions for other people.
#36 – Are We Giving The Impression That The Pro-Choice Position Has Validity?
Any time we sit down with abortion apologists in some starry-eyed quest for common ground, all we do is give the impression that even we believe their position has some moral validity.
#44 – “How can Pro-Lifers object to using parts from aborted babies for Medical research?”
Some people question how the pro-life movement can object to parts harvested from aborted babies being used in fetal tissue research and embryonic stem cell research. They argue that these babies are already dead and something good can come from it. But let’s take an honest look at that argument…