#58 – “The fetus depends on the woman for survival. So it’s her body, her choice.”

The pro-choice mob often defends abortions before viability on the basis that the unborn are dependent on someone else to survive. But if an unborn baby has no right to life simply because he or she is unable to survive without help, then there are others who have no right to life either.

Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!

Like how the pro-choice side often defends abortions before viability on the basis that the unborn are dependent on someone else to survive. See why this argument is flawed…



Watch Now

TRANSCRIPT

The pro-choice mob often defends abortions before viability on the basis that the unborn are dependent on someone else to survive. But by that standard, a six-month old baby is no more viable than an unborn baby since neither can survive without the support of others. This could also be said about some severely handicapped people, or those who are senile, comatose, unconscious, or under general anesthesia. If an unborn baby has no right to life simply because he or she is unable to survive without help, then these people have no right to life either.

Of course, another reason viability cannot be used to justify abortion is that the abortionist is the one who gets to determine whether his victim is viable or not. And if there is a better example of the fox guarding the hen-house, I don’t know what it would be.

  

***END***

Watch more “Abortion Distortion” videos from Life Dynamics for the no compromises, no exceptions, and no apologies pro-life position!
This video was made possible by our incredible donors.

For inquires or requests for interviews, please contact Sheila Crutcher at sheila@lifedynamics.com or (940) 380-8800.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Abortion Distortions: