#27 – “The Government Should Fund Abortions For The Poor!”

The pro-choice mob argues that the government should fund abortions for the poor so taxpayers don’t have to pay to raise their children. And few issues show the abysmal immorality of these people better than this one.

Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!

Like how the pro-choice mob argues that the government should fund abortions for the poor so taxpayers don’t have to pay to raise their children. And few issues show the abysmal immorality of these people better than this one. Watch to see why…



Watch Now

TRANSCRIPT

The pro-choice mob argues that the government should fund abortions for the poor so taxpayers don’t have to pay to raise their children.  And few issues show the abysmal immorality of these people better than this one. 

Just imagine that the two-year-old daughter of a poor family has fallen into an abandoned well.  Authorities calculate that a funeral is a cheaper than a rescue, and even if she survives she will probably be on welfare for the rest of her life.  So they decide to just flood the well with water, wait for the little girl’s corpse to float to the top, and then bury her.  It’s a monstrous idea, but if we are willing to reduce taxes by aborting the unborn children of the poor, why would we suddenly lose our nerve when it comes to killing their born children? 

  

***END***

Watch more “Abortion Distortion” videos from Life Dynamics for the no compromises, no exceptions, and no apologies pro-life position!
This video was made possible by our incredible donors.

For inquires or requests for interviews, please contact Sheila Crutcher at sheila@lifedynamics.com or (940) 380-8800.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Abortion Distortions:

Abortion Distortion #18: "Abortions often allow women to have successful careers!"

#18 – “Abortions often allow women to have successful careers!”

The pro-choice side argues that abortions often allow women to have successful careers that they could not have had if they were saddled with a baby. And if their point is that it’s possible to profit from killing other people, they’re right. In fact, it happens all the time. But is that really a justification for the intentional killing of another human being?