#24 – “Following The Science” On Abortion
The left always is always lecturing the rest of us to “follow the science.” But somehow, when the abortion issue comes up, all of a sudden science is off the table.
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
Like how the left always is always lecturing the rest of us to “follow the science.” But somehow, when the abortion issue comes up, all of a sudden science is off the table.
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
The godless left always is always lecturing the rest of us to “follow the science.” But somehow, when the abortion issue comes up, all of a sudden science is off the table.
In just one example, these people are constantly bringing up the issue of climate change, but their position on abortion is that each individual woman should be allowed to decide what is true about her unborn child. And yet, there is far more scientific proof that unborn children are living human beings than there is scientific proof that climate change is caused by human activity. Of course, the claim that abortion takes a human life is no longer just an opinion. Modern science and technology have proven it. And what that means is, the biggest science deniers on this planet are the people who defend legal abortion.
***END***
Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#123 – “I Would NEVER Have An Abortion But It Should Be Legal.”
People who say this want us to think that being both pro-life & pro-choice at the same time makes them thoughtful and open minded. But this is the reality…
#30 – “Thousands of Women Used To Die Every Year From Illegal Abortions!”
The pro-choice side still claims that thousands of women used to die every year from illegal abortions – despite their own people saying otherwise.
#95 – Downplaying Abortion As A “Simple Procedure”
The abortion lobby tries to down play what happens in an abortion by describing it as a simple procedure that only takes a few minutes. The question is, so what?