#120 – The Major Distinction Between Abortion & Amputation

Sometimes the pro-choice side will equate elective abortion to amputation. But are these two things morally equivalent? Let’s take a look…

Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!

Like how sometimes the pro-choice side will equate elective abortion to amputation.
It’s a perfect example of how low these people will sink in order to justify killing the unborn. Let’s take a look at the major distinction between abortion and amputations…



Watch Now

TRANSCRIPT

You will sometimes hear the pro-choice mob equate elective abortion to amputation. It’s a perfect example of how low these people will sink in order to justify killing the unborn. To begin with, amputations are done as a medical necessity and no ethical surgeon chops off a healthy part of someone’s body just because the patient asked them to.

But the abortion industry’s own data shows that almost every abortion they do is for non-medical reasons to kill a healthy baby being carried by a healthy woman whose pregnancy does not threaten her life or health. That alone destroys any claim of a similarity between elective abortion and amputation. But beyond that, anyone who can look at a picture of an aborted baby, alongside a picture of an amputated leg, and see the two procedures as morally equal, is sick.

***END***

Watch more “Abortion Distortion” videos from Life Dynamics for the no compromises, no exceptions, and no apologies pro-life position!
Since 1992, Life Dynamics has exposed the biggest horrors and coverups of the abortion industry. Learn more about our work.

For inquires or requests for interviews, please contact Sheila Crutcher at sheila@lifedynamics.com or (940) 380-8800.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Abortion Distortions: