The Uproar Over Another Supreme Court Nomination

The reality is, every pro-lifer in America needs to be on their knees thanking God that Donald Trump is making this this next Supreme Court nomination.

Written By: Mark Crutcher
President of Life Dynamics

To all those Trump-haters who claim to be pro-life, I want ask one more time:

Would you prefer that Hillary Clinton was making this next Supreme Court nomination?

And before you answer, let me also point out that this is Trump’s second pick, but it would have been Clinton’s third.  Remember, Ruth Bader Ginsburg made it clear that she would have retired if Clinton had been elected.

Current Supreme Court
Credit: Franz Jantzen – Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States

In other words, had Trump not won, in a few weeks fully one-fourth of the United States Supreme Court would have been appointed by Hillary Clinton with two of the other members having been put there by Obama. If that had happened, everything we’ve worked for would have been flushed down the drain and the entire pro-life effort would now be on hospice care.  So again, is THAT what you would prefer?

The reality is, every pro-lifer in America needs to be on their knees thanking God that Donald Trump is making this decision.


This article was originally posted on ProlifeAmerica.com under the title, “The Supreme Court Conundrum”

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Articles From Life Dynamics:

Pro-Life check scandal exposed supporting abortion groups !

A company which sells pro-life checks alongside checks with Christian messages called, Life Checks, has been duping pro-life people for years promoting organizations that support abortion under other company names. Pro-life checks are a great way for pro-life people to get the message out about abortion but an investigation conducted by Life Dynamics in 2005…

Gruber’s nemesis called his paper on abortion creepy

Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who recently questioned ObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber about a paper he wrote which discussed how the government had saved billions of dollars by targeting abortion to the poor, is calling the paper creepy and based in eugenics. In a December 9, 2014 hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee,…