#120 – The Major Distinction Between Abortion & Amputation
Sometimes the pro-choice side will equate elective abortion to amputation. But are these two things morally equivalent? Let’s take a look…
Sometimes the pro-choice side will equate elective abortion to amputation. But are these two things morally equivalent? Let’s take a look…
The pro-choice side argues that women are going to have abortions no matter what the law says, and keeping them legal makes sure they happen in a safe environment. Of course, this is a preposterous argument. See why…
One of the abortion lobby’s marketing strategies is to portray women as victims of their pregnancies where the children are their enemies. Of course, the goal behind all this is obvious…
Some abortion defenders say that abortion is not murder because the fetus is not fully developed. But that doesn’t make it okay to kill them.
The pro-choice side has accused the pro-life movement of being a bunch of “anti-choice extremists who are trying to force their religious beliefs on everyone else.” Since “choice” means having the legal right to butcher defenseless children, then we are indeed anti-choice. But as for the claim that we are trying pass laws to force our theological views on others, that is idiocy.
The pro-choice side chants that “it’s the woman’s body” as if there is only one body involved. Watch to see how idiotic this is…
You often hear people talk about “the miracle of child birth.” But could we be accidentally reinforcing pro-choice rhetoric?
The pro-choice side argues that a woman who is pregnant from rape should not have to bear the child of the monster who attacked her. But that cannot be avoided. Here’s the truth…
One of the abortion lobby’s standard lies is to claim that the pro-life movement is trying to force women to have babies. But is that really the truth?
Life Dynamics has had decades of direct contact with thousands of post-abortive women and, here are three important things we have learned from these interactions.