It is important to remember that every time there is a figure in the “COMP” column, that figure represents a population control facility in a ZIP code that is disproportionately black, disproportionately Hispanic or, in many cases, both.

The fact is that even a cursory scan of those columns takes the allegations of racial targeting made in Maafa 21 and transforms them into an observable and undeniable reality.

The numbers are staggering.

As just one example, consider Texas which has 94 Zip codes with at least one population control facility. Of those, only 22 are not disproportionately black and/or Hispanic.

As the charts demonstrate, similar patterns are found across the country and they do not vary appreciably by the size of the state. In Connecticut – a state thoroughly dissimilar from Texas in size, culture and geography – there are 21 Zip codes in which population control facilities are located and only six are not disproportionately black and/or Hispanic.

It is also important to note the number of times there are multiple facilities in disproportionately minority ZIP codes. For example, in New Jersey, ZIP code 07631 has a black population 286.7% of the state’s overall percentage and a Hispanic population 163.9% of the state. That ZIP code alone has four population control facilities. Similarly, Minnesota ZIP code 55404 has a black population that is 797.1% of the overall state percentage and a Hispanic population 537.9% of the state. In that ZIP code there are three population control centers.

Again, this pattern is repeated in state after state. We identified 116 ZIP codes with more than one population control facility. Of those, 84 were disproportionately black and/or Hispanic. What this means is that, when the American family planning industry places multiple facilities in a ZIP code, that ZIP code is more than two-and-a-half times as likely to be disproportionately minority as not.

What we now know – and have documented – is that there is not one state in the union without population control centers located in ZIP codes with higher percentages of blacks and/or Hispanics than the state’s overall percentage. In fact, Hawaii is the only state that does not have facilities located in ZIP codes exceeding 125% of their overall percentage.

Not only is this racial targeting widespread, it’s scale is often enormous. We found 42 states with family planning facilities in ZIP codes where the black and/or Hispanic populations exceeds 200% of the state’s overall percentage. More telling is that these percentages routinely go far beyond even this level. Numerous states have facilities in ZIP codes that range from 250% to well over 1,000% and it is not uncommon for them to have facilities located in many such ZIP codes.

In the end, this data speaks for itself and does not require a lot of analysis. The numbers make it clear that the African-American and Hispanic communities have been targeted and logic makes it clear that this did not happen coincidentally or unintentionally.

It should also be noted that this eugenics effort is being funded with taxpayer money. Currently, Planned Parenthood alone receives approximately one million dollars a day from the federal government plus an unknown amount in state and local funds. Moreover, this has been going on for decades.

For years, there have been those within the American political system who have taken action to address the disproportionate treatment of minorities. Earlier, this issue was raised in the context of alcohol and tobacco marketing but, make no mistake, it exists in many other parts of our culture as well.

Now, this report validates the revelations contained in Maafa 21 to create a new challenge. The question becomes whether the political leaders who have so righteously spoken out against these other injustices, will remain silent in the face of this one. Should that be their decision, they will surrender their credibility and lose the right to ever again be outraged.