#27 – “The Government Should Fund Abortions For The Poor!”
The pro-choice mob argues that the government should fund abortions for the poor so taxpayers don’t have to pay to raise their children. And few issues show the abysmal immorality of these people better than this one.
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
Like how the pro-choice mob argues that the government should fund abortions for the poor so taxpayers don’t have to pay to raise their children. And few issues show the abysmal immorality of these people better than this one. Watch to see why…
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
The pro-choice mob argues that the government should fund abortions for the poor so taxpayers don’t have to pay to raise their children. And few issues show the abysmal immorality of these people better than this one.
Just imagine that the two-year-old daughter of a poor family has fallen into an abandoned well. Authorities calculate that a funeral is a cheaper than a rescue, and even if she survives she will probably be on welfare for the rest of her life. So they decide to just flood the well with water, wait for the little girl’s corpse to float to the top, and then bury her. It’s a monstrous idea, but if we are willing to reduce taxes by aborting the unborn children of the poor, why would we suddenly lose our nerve when it comes to killing their born children?
***END***
Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#5 – Have Thousands Really Died From Back-Alley Abortions?
The abortion lobby says that women used to die by the thousands every year from back-alley abortions. The truth is, they have been lying about this issue from day one!
#100 – The “Miracle Of Child Birth”
You often hear people talk about “the miracle of child birth.” But could we be accidentally reinforcing pro-choice rhetoric?
#110 – Adopting ALL The Unwanted Children
Pro-choice people often asks the pro-lifers whether we are willing to adopt all the unwanted children who will be born if abortion is outlawed. Regardless of the answer, the real issue is that the basis of their argument is preposterous to begin with.