#22 – “Sex Education Reduces The Abortion Rate.”
Abortion defenders say that the pro-life movement is hypocritical for opposing sex education since it would reduce the abortion rate. They are lying.
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
Like how abortion defenders say that the pro-life movement is hypocritical for opposing sex education since it would reduce the abortion rate. They are lying – watch to see why…
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
Abortion defenders say that the pro-life movement is hypocritical for opposing sex education since it would reduce the abortion rate. They are lying. What the pro-life movement opposes are the sex education programs that have produced an epidemic of promiscuity, teen pregnancy, abortion, and sexually transmitted diseases.
The real question is, why do organizations like Planned Parenthood continue to push these programs despite these well-known failures? And the answer is that, for them, these programs have not failed. To the contrary, they continue to provide a reliable stream of customers for their birth control pills, abortions, and STD treatments. The fact is, allowing these amoral hustlers to teach our children about sex is like hiring crack dealers to teach them about drugs.
***END***
Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#82 – “Abortion Saves The Lives Of Women Who Might Die In Childbirth!”
Abortion supporters claim that abortion is justified because it saves the lives of women who might die in childbirth. Watch to see how outrageous this claim is.
#1 – “Equal Rights For Me, Not For Thee”
Pro-Choicers like to say that, because men don’t have a uterus, they have no right to express an opinion about abortion. But what happened to the idea that our society was supposed to be against gender-based discrimination?
#15 – Why Some Admit The Unborn Are Living Human Beings But Still Say Abortion Should Be Legal
Many people will concede that the unborn are living human beings, but then turn right around and say it should be legal to intentionally kill them. Of course, the explanation for this is both obvious and ugly.