#1 – “Equal Rights For Me, Not For Thee”

Pro-Choicers like to say that, because men don’t have a uterus, they have no right to express an opinion about abortion.  But what happened to the idea that our society was supposed to be against gender-based discrimination? 

Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!

Like how pro-choice people often say that, because men don’t have a uterus, they have no right to express an opinion about abortion. But what happened to the idea that our society was supposed to be against gender-based discrimination?



Watch Now

TRANSCRIPT

Those of you in the abortion lobby like to say that, because men don’t have a uterus, they have no right to express an opinion about abortion.  But what happened to the idea that our society was supposed to be against gender-based discrimination?  And let’s not forget, you’re the ones who brought men into this issue when you started demanding that abortions be paid for with tax dollars.  After all, a lot of that money comes from the paychecks of men.  But the bigger issue is that real men don’t just stand around with their hands in their pockets while helpless babies are butchered.  That means that being involved in this issue is not only their right, it’s their duty.  So whether you like it or not, as long as you’re killing babies, some of the people fighting you will be men.  Deal with it. 

  

***END***

Watch more “Abortion Distortion” videos from Life Dynamics for the no compromises, no exceptions, and no apologies pro-life position!
This video was made possible by our incredible donors.

For inquires or requests for interviews, please contact Sheila Crutcher at sheila@lifedynamics.com or (940) 380-8800.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Abortion Distortions:

Abortion Distortion #18: "Abortions often allow women to have successful careers!"

#18 – “Abortions often allow women to have successful careers!”

The pro-choice side argues that abortions often allow women to have successful careers that they could not have had if they were saddled with a baby. And if their point is that it’s possible to profit from killing other people, they’re right. In fact, it happens all the time. But is that really a justification for the intentional killing of another human being?