#102 – Debunking The “Better Aborted Than Abused” Argument
When adoption is suggested as an alternative to abortion, abortion supporters demand to know how we can guarantee that children who get adopted won’t be abused or neglected.
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
Like how when adoption is suggested as an alternative to abortion, abortion supporters ask how we can guarantee that children who get adopted won’t be abused or neglected. Of course, the answer is we can’t. But watch as we expose this argument as a sham!
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
When adoption is suggested as an alternative to abortion, the pro- choice mob asks how we can guarantee that children who get adopted won’t be abused or neglected. The answer is: we can’t – anymore that we can guarantee that children who live with their biological mom and dad won’t get abused or neglected. But I think we can safely assume that, if unborn children could speak for themselves, they would prefer to take their chances in even the worst adoptive family as opposed to being sliced up alive at some abortion clinic.
The point is, once again, we see that the abortion lobby’s only solution for any problem related to children, is to kill the children. In this case, their suggestion that we can avoid adoption problems by executing the adoptees is like saying we can prevent rapes by executing women.
***END***
Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#7 – Not All Choices Are Morally Equal
The abortion lobby likes to portray the concept of “choice” as something that is inherently and universally noble. It is not.
#59 – The Flaw With The Pro-Choice “Trust Women” Argument
The pro-choice side claims that when it comes to abortion, they trust women to make their own decisions. But why do they only apply it to abortion?
#110 – Adopting ALL The Unwanted Children
Pro-choice people often asks the pro-lifers whether we are willing to adopt all the unwanted children who will be born if abortion is outlawed. Regardless of the answer, the real issue is that the basis of their argument is preposterous to begin with.