This week on the podcast, we discuss the outrageous pro-choice concepts that we often treat with a seriousness that they don’t deserve – such as “consent to pregnancy,” “reproductive justice,” how the term fetus is used to indicate the unborn aren’t human babies, and more! Plus, we talk about the growing number of pro-lifers convicted of violating the F.A.C.E. act, and the legal debate it has sparked about its constitutionality and how it can be weaponized.
The pro-choice side says that the law has no right to control what a woman does with her own body. But let’s follow the science…
Since Harry Blackmun’s Roe vs Wade decision, the pro-choice lobby has relied on the “no-one-knows-when-life-begins” lie as a rationalization for their baby-killing enterprise.
Over the years, George Orwell’s observation that some things are so stupid only an intellectual could believe them has proven to be frighteningly accurate. The entire pro-choice position is a testament to the fact that the human brain is the only organism in nature that has the ability to intentionally deceive itself.
We all know that language plays a crucial role in the battle over abortion. And it is no secret that the American abortion lobby is extraordinarily talented in the manipulation and distortion of rhetoric. It is also true that their loyal little lapdogs in the media have memorized and employed all the verbal gymnastics their…
Pro-Lifers are routinely portrayed as cold-hearted knuckle-draggers who would deny medical treatment to Alzheimer’s ravished diabetics just to satisfy our own personal agendas. Of course, the basis for this depiction is a lie.
There are numerous examples of how the defense of abortion has been forced to change over the years. The reason for this is simple and always the same: the pro-choice position is not based on any fundamental or observable truth.
No products in the cart.
