#3 – The “pro-life with exceptions” position is a fraud.
Some people claim to be pro-life while saying that abortion should be legal in some circumstances. But the truth is, the “pro-life with exceptions” position is a fraud. Watch to see why.
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
But some times it is also necessary to expose the illogical arguments of those who claim to be “pro-life.” For example, some people claim to be pro-life while saying that abortion should be legal in some circumstances. But the truth is, the “pro-life with exceptions” position is a fraud. Watch below to see why.
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
Some people claim to be pro-life while saying that abortion should be legal in some circumstances. So on one hand, they agree that unborn children are living human beings – after all, there is no other basis for being pro-life – but on the other hand they say it should be legal to kill some of them. For example, it’s okay to kill babies with Down syndrome or babies conceived in rape. But the truth is, the “pro-life with exceptions” position is a fraud. It’s as irrational as someone in 1850 saying, “Slaves have a right to be free, but in some situations it should be legal to own a few.” Remember, the only legitimate pro-life position is that if a given circumstance does not justify killing a five-year-old or a 50-year-old, it does not justify killing an unborn child.
***END***
Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#7 – Not All Choices Are Morally Equal
The abortion lobby likes to portray the concept of “choice” as something that is inherently and universally noble. It is not.
#50 – Denying The Holocaust
We live in a nation full of holocaust deniers – only the holocaust they are denying didn’t take place 80 yrs ago in Germany, it’s happening right here, right now.
#14 – “Women Have A Right To Control Their Own Bodies!”
The pro-choice side often defends abortion with the argument that women have a right to control their own bodies. Of course, this assumes that the unborn child is part of the mother’s body and ignores the biological reality that they are separate individuals.