#121 – Men: No Choice, But All The Responsibility
If a man has no say in whether or not this child is killed, how can he be held responsible for the welfare of that child?
Welcome to our new series, “Abortion Distortion,” where we turn the tables and make the pro-choice side defend the illogical, deceptive and immoral nature of their positions!
Like how the pro-choice side says that a man has no right to interfere if his partner chooses to abort their child, but if she chooses to let the child live, he’s legally responsible for supporting that child. The question is, how does someone become legally responsible for something that the law says is none of their business?
Watch Now
TRANSCRIPT
The pro-choice mob says that a man has no right to interfere if his partner chooses to abort their child – even if she admits that he is the child’s father. But yet, if she chooses to let the child live, he becomes legally responsible for supporting that child for the next eighteen years, and he can be thrown in prison if he fails to do so. The obvious question is, if he has no say in whether or not this child is killed, how can he be held responsible for the welfare of that child?
In other words, how does someone become legally responsible for something that the law says is none of their business? Also, are there other area of the law where this standard is applied, and is it only enforced against men, or are there areas where it is also applied to women?
***END***
Share This:
More Abortion Distortions:
#51 – Does Abortion Prevent Deaths Due To Childbirth?
The pro-choice side often claims that legalized abortion prevents deaths due to childbirth. Watch to see just how phony this argument is – and how it actually has nothing to do with protecting women.
#91 – Who’s Really At Fault For illegal Abortions?
The pro-choice side claims that our efforts to protect the unborn will cause women to die in illegal abortions. But is that really true?
#86 – “Governments Often Pay For Things Taxpayers Disagree With.”
When the abortion lobby demands government funding for abortion, they often argue that it is common for governments to pay for things that some taxpayers disagree with. But at the same time these same people say that the government has no right to be involved in the abortion issue.